Modifying State of a Component Directly

Evan Hicks —
jump to solution

The Problem

The state of a component is managed internally by React. Updating the state of a component directly can have unintended consequences that can be difficult to debug.

class Counter extends Component {
    constructor(props) {
        super(props)
        this.state = {
            counter: 0,
        }
    }

    increment() {
        this.state.counter = this.state.counter + this.props.increment
    }
}

If the state is updated directly as in the example above, the component will not rerender since the state is compared shallowly. Additionally, the update may be lost if there are other state changes queued asynchronously using setState.

Another common problem is using the current state/props to update the new state.

class Counter extends Component {
    constructor(props) {
        super(props)
        this.state = {
            counter: 0,
        }
    }

    increment() {
        this.setState({
            counter: this.state.counter + this.props.increment
        })
    }
}

This will potentially cause issues due to a potential race condition between other state/prop changes and this particular state update. What happens if the props and/or state change before this state update happens?

The Solution

The solution for the first example is to always use the setState function to ensure state changes are properly queued. For the second problem, React provides a different version of setState that takes a function instead of an object.

class Counter extends Component {
    constructor(props) {
        super(props)
        this.state = {
            counter: 0,
        }
    }

    increment() {
        this.setState((prevState, props) => ({
            counter: prevState.counter + props.increment
        }))
    }
}

This will ensure that the state change happens with the correct version of the previous state and props.

Using Functional Components with useState

In modern React, functional components with the useState hook are the recommended way to manage state. The same counter looks like this:

import { useState } from "react";

function Counter({ increment }) {
  const [counter, setCounter] = useState(0);

  function handleIncrement() {
    setCounter((prev) => prev + increment);
  }

  return <button onClick={handleIncrement}>{counter}</button>;
}

Passing a function to setCounter avoids the same stale-state problem described above: React calls the function with the current value, so the update is always based on the latest state.

Further Reading

If you’re looking to get a deeper understanding of how JavaScript error reporting works, take a look at the following articles:

Considered "not bad" by 4 million developers and more than 150,000 organizations worldwide, Sentry provides code-level observability to many of the world's best-known companies like Disney, Peloton, Cloudflare, Eventbrite, Slack, Supercell, and Rockstar Games. Each month we process billions of exceptions from the most popular products on the internet.

Sentry